Eleanor of Aquitaines Children and Grandchildren

Eleanor of Aquitaine has been called the â€Å"grandmother of Europe† for the connections of her children and grandchildren to many royal houses.  Here are the children and grandchildren of Eleanor of Aquitaine: First Marriage: to Louis VII of France Eleanor of Aquitaine (1122 – 1204) married Prince Louis of France, later Louis VII of France (1120 – 1180), on July 25, 1137. Their marriage was annulled in 1152, and Louis maintained custody of their daughters. 1. Marie, Countess of Champagne Marie of France (1145 – 1198) married Henry I (1127 – 1181), Count of Champagne, in 1164.  They had four children.   2. Alix, Countess of Blois Alix of France (1151 – 1197) married Theobold V (1130 – 1191), Count of Blois, in 1164.  They had seven children. More details and generations: Eleanor of Aquitaines Children and Grandchildren: Her First Marriage Second Marriage: Henry II of England After Eleanor of Aquitaine’s first marriage was annulled, she married Henry FitzEmpress (1133 – 1189), later Henry II of England, the son of Empress Matilda, would-be English queen. 1. William IX, Count of Poitiers William IX (1153 – 1156), Count of Poitiers 2. Henry the Young King Henry (1155 – 1183) the Young King married Margaret of France (betrothed November 2, 1160, married August 27, 1172).  Her father was Louis VII of France, Eleanor of Aquitaine’s first husband, and her mother was Louis’ second wife, Constance of Castile; Henry and Margaret shared two older half-sisters, Marie and Alix. After Henry’s death she married Bela III of Hungary in 1186. William of England (1177 – 1177), born premature, died three days after birth 3. Matilda, Duchess of Saxony and of Bavaria Matilda (1156 – 1189) of England, married as his second wife, Henry the Lion, Duke of Saxony and of Bavaria. Their children lived in England after their father was deposed in 1180 until their mother’s death; William, the youngest child, was born in that exile period. More details and generations: Eleanor of Aquitaine’s Descendants Through Matilda, Duchess of Saxony 4. Richard I of England Richard I (1157 – 1199) of England, married Berengaria of Navarre (1170 – 1230); they had no children 5. Geoffrey II, Duke of Brittany Geoffrey II (1158 – 1186), Duke of Brittany, married Constance, Duchess of Brittany (1161 – 1201) in 1181. More details and generations: Eleanor of Aquitaine’s Descendants Through Geoffrey II of Brittany 6. Eleanor, Queen of Castile Eleanor (1162 – 1214) of England married Alfonso VIII (1155 – 1214), King of Castile, in 1177 More details and generations: Eleanor of Aquitaine’s Descendants Through Eleanor, Queen of Castille 7. Joan, Queen of Sicily Joan (1165 – 1199) of England, married first William II (1155 – 1189) of Sicily in 1177, then married, as his fifth of six wives, Raymond VI (1156 – 1222) of Toulouse in 1197. More details and generations: Eleanor of Aquitaine’s Descendants Through Joan, Queen of Sicily 8. John of England John (1166 – 1216) of England, known as John Lackland, married first Isabella (~1173 – 1217), Countess of Gloucester, in 1189 (betrothed 1176, annulled 1199, she married twice more), then second, in 1200, Isabella (~1188 – 1246), Countess of Angoulà ªme (she remarried after John’s death). More details and generations: Eleanor of Aquitaine’s Descendants Through John, King of England Two of Eleanors Ancestors (Grandchildren / Great-Grandchildren) were canonized as saints in the Roman Catholic Church:  Ferdinand II, King of Castile and Leà ³n, Isabelle of France The Royal Houses Listed here are some of the descendants of Eleanor of Aquitaine -- children, grandchildren and great grandchildren only -- who were kings, queens, empresses (the women usually as consorts though a few ruled in their own right): England: Henry the Young King, Richard I of England, John of England, Eleanor Fair Maid of Brittany was for a time proposed as the rightful ruler of England, Henry III of England. Edward I of England France: Blanche of Castile, Queen of France, Louis IX of France Spain (Castile, Leon, Aragon): Eleanor, Queen of Castile, Ferdinand II, King of Castile and Leà ³n, Berengaria, Queen of Castile and Leà ³n (ruled Castile briefly in her own right), Eleanor of Castile, Queen of Aragon, Henry of Castile Portugal: Urraca of Castile, Queen of Portugal, Sancho II of Portugal, Afonso III of Portugal Scotland: Joan of England, Queen of Scotland, Margaret of England, Queen of Scotland Other: Otto IV, Holy Roman Emperor, Richard of Cornwall, King of the Romans, Isabella of England, Holy Roman Empress, Charles I of Sicily, Marie of Champagne, Empress of Constantinople, Alice of Champagne, Queen of Cyprus, Berengaria of Leà ³n, Queen of Jerusalem, Eleanor of Portugal, Queen of Denmark, Eleanor de Montfort, Princess of Wales More About Eleanor of Aquitaine Eleanor of Aquitaine BiographySiblings of Eleanor of Aquitaine

Roosevelt Fight Against Communism - 1929 Words

Yasmine Neyoy Mr. Cristafi Senior Modern English p.3 24 April 2015 Franklin D. Roosevelt: Fight against Communism When you think about our thirty-second president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the first thing that usually comes to mind is the New Deal. Although the Nations people praise him, and still do for that one thing, they still tend to underestimate how much he did for America and its people. As the longest serving President, he did much more than sign a couple of treaties. Franklin D. Roosevelt was President of the United States from to , he came to the presidency during one of the most crucial time periods for the United States as a nation, and for the world. President Roosevelt not only pulled America and its people out of the greatest depression during his presidency but also one of the greatest war that the Nation has ever faced. Communism was on the rise by the time his presidency was about to end but re-elected for a third term so that he could help them out of the rise of communism. The nation looked up to him as the ir only hope to be able to either keep them out of war and control from communism, or stop Nazi-Germany from ruling all of Europe. Franklin D. Roosevelt was the nation s savior by pulling the U.S. out of the Great Depression, World War II, and stopping any further expansion of communism. When President Roosevelt was starting his first term in 1932, he stepped into a crucial era, the Great Depression. The Great Depression began when theShow MoreRelatedEssay on Fighting for Equality and Freedom1229 Words   |  5 Pagesthe war effort and help defend America to gain their freedom. This freedom for America meant to protect home soil from foreign threats. Through equality and freedom, America can become what the founding fathers sought it out to be, a land free of communism and disparity. All throughout history and some may even argue that still today inequality and racism are prevalent and carry an enormous impact. During the course of WWII, there were many strides to end inequality at home and overseas. While someRead MoreA New Form Of Government During World War II1674 Words   |  7 Pagesearly 20th century a new form of government emerged in Russia: Communism. Communist values contradicted capitalist values; thus dividing the Western world from Russia. Communist-Russia quickly concentrated its hostility towards America, in which the United States responded with support of anti-communist parties. Subsequently, Adolf Hitler waged war in 1939, creating chaos in Europe. However, the two nations would unite to fight against Nazi Germany in World War II, consequently burying past aggressionRead MoreWhy Did The Soviets Could Take Control Of Iran?886 Words   |  4 Pagestake control of Iran and something should be done. Kermit Roosevelt was tasked with developing a propaganda campaign against Mossadegh. The efforts almost worked but failed and Shah that was to take Mossadegh’s place fled the country. Roosevelt tried again a few days later by organizing demonstrations against Mossadegh, which were joined by the Communists. At the same time Roosevelt set up demonstrations in support of the Shah. Roosevelt was able to help overcome Mossadegh, resulting in his arrestRead MoreThe Cold War And The Soviet Union1343 Words   |  6 Pagesthe the opponents’ social systems. To find out who provoked the Cold War, the US, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdoms ,Roosevelt, Truman ,Stalin, and Churchill should be considered as the essential factors. Because of those giants and their countries ,the peace after the war became so fragile. Introduction: The Cold War, during which the Capitalism versus the Communism, divided the world-- some countries like Germany and Korea --into two camps. There is no doubt that America and Russia ,theRead MoreAmerican Government During The Twentieth Century1626 Words   |  7 Pagesbegin to expand exponentially until the twentieth century through World War I, the New Deal, World War II, and the Cold War. The increase in government growth through these time periods ultimately gave Americans reason to form a political party against â€Å"big government.† This political party, the Libertarian party, has gained enough support to become the third largest political party in the United States following behind the Republican and Democratic Party. Through examination of the need for suchRead MoreChanges in America Between 1920 and 1960 Essay1404 Words   |  6 Pagesand domestic, were the changing forces to the country in the twenties to the sixties. In the beginning of the 1900’s, the country made dramatic changes toward progressivism in domestic issues. These changes were first made by President Theodore Roosevelt, who signed the Pure Foods and Drug Act of 1906. This bill was made, â€Å"For preventing the manufacture, sale, or transportation of adulterated or misbranded or poisonous or deleterious foods, drugs, medicines, and liquors, and for regulating trafficRead MoreThe End Of One War1453 Words   |  6 Pagesultimately created obstacles in the process. After the second world war, against Germany and its allies, the United States of America (USA) and the Soviet Union (USSR) were the two of the strongest countries left standing, but only one could emerge as the true leader. Even though there was tension between the two countries even before World War II, they agreed to put their differences aside and unite to fight the Nazis. Once the war was over, remaining allies in the future seemed like a complicatedRead MoreThe United States During World War I1506 Words   |  7 Pagesbetween the nations during peace time. During WWII communism was a way of life in Russia. Communism is the belief that all all property is community property. Equality is the social class and there is no government. Fascism is a system where society is ruled by a dictator. Therefore the government tells people what to do. In other words it is an aggressive form of nationalism. Germany was a fascist country was afraid of the spread of communism. Adolph Hitler rose to power after world war one andRead MoreThe New Deal – Was It A Good Deal? Essay1562 Words   |  7 Pagesmilitary lives on the line to fight against communism; and then that same country would begin to implement programs and legislation within their own country that would ultimately lead to a governing body comparable to communism? This question is complex; yet the answer is revealed when the United States of America finds itself in this exact situation. Government expansion into the lives of American citizens is consistent with the common principles u nderlying communism and socialism—the very principlesRead MoreWorld War II : The United States1202 Words   |  5 Pagesbrought many benefits to the United States such as advancement in technology and medicine, economic growth, and the start of the Civil Rights movement. Due to the Japanese attack, President Roosevelt’s inspiration, and the fear of the spread of communism, the American people sacrificed and united together during the war, which was a major reason the Allies won World War II. The amount of unity that occurred in World War II was unprecedented. I believe this solidarity and sacrifice was for many

Toyota and Uber Free Essays

As the competition among autonomous driving businesses is getting intense, Toyota and Uber will try to catch up by deciding to partner in developing self-driving cars. They plan to use technology from both companies into Toyota’s Sienna minivans to be deployed across Uber’s ride-hailing network from 2021. Together, they aim to design and produce safe autonomous vehicles for the mass market. We will write a custom essay sample on Toyota and Uber or any similar topic only for you Order Now This deal benefits both Toyota and Uber, and will still likely benefit both companies even in their individual endeavors. Their partnership profits Uber in many ways. Firstly, CEO Khrosrowshahi’s strategy of Uber developing autonomous vehicles through partnerships has successfully began to progress. Secondly, it brings revival to Uber’s self-driving business after a self-driving Uber SUV killed a pedestrian in Arizona back in March, which moved Uber to remove its robot cars from the road, lay off hundreds of test drives and closed its autonomous testing hub in Arizona. Lastly, Toyota’s investment raised the valuation of Uber by $4 billion from the deal Uber had with Alphabet Inc. Uber totaled $891 million losses in the second quarter where the self-driving unit is a significant contributor. However, it can compensate its losses through this partnership. With combined technology, their goal of a safe autonomous vehicle is likely to happen. And with this success, profits from their self-driving business will surely compensate the losses Uber previously occurred. Toyota also profits from this agreement through its transformation to a mobility company as they help provide a path for safe and secure expansion of mobility services like ride-sharing that includes Toyota vehicles and technologies. Its statement that it would not combine its research efforts with Uber may somewhat have a negative impact on the partnership’s progress in producing safe automated vehicles. But, Toyota benefits from the deal when they gain more information regarding self-driving technology as they work with Uber. Together, they make a great teamwork. Uber’s autonomous driving system and Toyota’s commitment to safety and its renowned manufacturing skills is surely to bring a safe self-driving car. Uber have experienced many problems in this path: they had further setbacks in development and testing due to the crash in Arizona, and also has met difficulties with regulators and politicians concerning safety. But Toyota’s Guardian technology, which offers automated safety features, can cover Uber’s flaws. Toyota may be less aggressive than some rivals on moving toward full-fledged autonomous driving but their investment in research and plans to begin testing self-driving cars in the future is a great move. They won’t be able to survive the competitive autonomous self-driving business if they continue to focus on partial autonomous systems. This partnership is a great start for them in their journey to produce fully developed self-driving cars. Toyota’s decision to not combine its research efforts is also a good move since Uber has other partnerships like their partnership with Daimler AG, and a deal with Volvo which does not have the same level of intense labor as Toyota does. This could lead to misunderstandings or conflicts of interest, so it is best that they keep some plans to themselves. Their previous partnership on a car-leasing program for Uber drivers, where Toyota invested in Uber and which Uber decided to close its U.S. leasing business, is also a factor that can affect their relationship. This could mean distrust between the companies that can badly affect their current deal. Overall, their partnership brings great opportunities to both companies. Toyota benefits from the agreement and Uber does, too. Their goal in producing the world’s safest self-driving cars on the Uber network is surely to become reality if they work together in covering each other’s flaws and leveraging their expertise. How to cite Toyota and Uber, Papers

Business and Corporation Law Jurisdiction and Duty

Question: Discuss about the Business and Corporation Law for Jurisdiction and Duty. Answer: Introduction The occupier of a property owes a duty of care to all the persons who visit his property. The occupier should ensure a safe environment to all those who enters his property. Sometimes, a defect may arise in a property and it is the responsibility of the occupier to cure such defects so that the persons who enter or use his property do not get injured. Thus, an occupier has a duty to take proper steps if he can foresee some injury arising out of any defect in the property. This assignment makes an analysis of the case of Baker v Gilbert, which was decided by the New South Wales Court of Appeal in 2003. Facts of the case Ms Gilbert jumped off from a footoplate which was attached to a swimming pool ladder. The footplate was unstable and Ms Gilbert hurt himself after jumping off from it. She landed awkwardly and got seriously injured. The incident occurred in the premise of Mr. Baker. The reason for which the ladder was unstable was because certain bolts in the footplate was loose. Baker said that he was not aware of the defects in the footplate and he never visited the pool area, which was not far from his place of residence. Issue involved in the case Whether or not a householder, who does not know the existence of a defect to his property (swimming pool ladder) that might cause danger to a lawful visitor, but is aware of circumstances which would alert a reasonable person to the danger from such a defect, may ignore the existence of the defect. Decision The Court found that the accident was caused as the bolts of the footplate was not stable. The risk was foreseeable and must have been avoided by any reasonable person. The Court referred to the cases of Hackshaw vs Shaw and Australian Safeway Stores Pty Limited v Zaluzna. The facts of the case of Hackshaw vs Shaw were that Shaw owned a firm where storage of petrol was done. One night two thieves came to the Shaws firm with an intention to steal petrol. Shaw became aware of the incident and fired warning shots at the car. Hackshaw, who was seating the front seat of the car got injured die to such firing. Shaw claimed that he was totally unaware of the fact that Hacksaw was sitting in the front seat of the car. The Court decided the case against Shaw. According to the court, the injury was quite foreseeable and Shaw had a duty of care to avoid such injury. Shaw should have foreseen that a person might be sitting in the front seat of the car and should have acted with care. But Shaw was negligent in firing the shots which resulted in the injury to Hackshaw. Thus, it was held that a duty of care is owed by an occupier of property towards a trespasser if the occupier could foresee that injury could be caused to the trespasser by the negligence of the occup ier (Sheehan Amara, 2012). In the case of Australia Safeway Stores Pty Ltd Zaluzna, the plaintiff visited the store of the defendant. It was raining outside and the foyer was wet due to which the plaintiff slipped and got injured. A suit of negligence was filed by the plaintiff. It was held by the Court that the defendant had a general duty of care towards the plaintiff. The injury was reasonably foreseeable and the defendant should have taken precautions to avoid causing injury to the plaintiff. But the defendant failed to do so and as a result the defendant was held liable for negligence (Maitland, 2013). In the instant case, the Court held that Baker was liable for not taking proper precaution. The injury was foreseeable and Baker had a duty of care. He should have taken care of the footplate as it was unstable and prone to causing injury to the persons using it. But Baker had not dispensed his responsibility of taking proper precautions and as a result he should pay compensation to Ms. Gilbert. Conclusion Thus, an occupier cannot take a defense that he is unaware of the defects in the property. If an injury, which may arise out of any defects in the property, is foreseeable by a reasonable man, the occupier should take appropriate steps to avoid such risk of causing injury. In the case of Baker v Gilbert, the occupier (baker) had not taken any precaution and therefore he was negligent and he should pay compensation top Ms Gilbert. References Maitland, I. (2013). CSL Australia PTY LTD v Formosa: Jurisdiction and Duty of Care. Austl. NZ Mar. LJ, 27, 18. Sheehan, J., Amara. (2012). Applying an Australian native title framework to Bedouin property. Indigenous (In) Justice: Human Rights Law and Bedouin Arabs in the Naqab/Negev, 4, 229.